|
January 2001
Level 5 Leadership
(Sidebar: Not by Level 5 Alone)
Harvard Business Review
by Jim Collins
Level 5 leadership is one essential factor for taking a company
from good to great, but it’s not the only one. Our research uncovered
multiple factors that deliver companies to greatness. And it is
the combined package, Level 5 plus these other drivers, that takes
companies beyond unremarkable. There is a symbiotic relationship
between Level 5 and the rest of our findings: Level 5 enables
implementation of the other findings, and practicing the other
findings may help you get to Level 5. We’ve already talked about
who Level 5 leaders are; the rest of our findings describe what
they do. Here is a brief look at some of the other key findings.
First Who: We expected that good-to-great leaders would
start with the vision and strategy. Instead, they attended to
people first, strategy second. They got the right people on the
bus, moved the wrong people off, ushered the right people to the
right seatsand then they figured out where to drive it.
Stockdale Paradox: This finding is named after Admiral
James Stockdale, winner of the Medal of Honor, who survived seven
years in the most brutal Vietcong POW camp by hanging on to two
contradictory beliefs: his life couldn’t be worse at the moment,
and his life would someday be better than ever. Like Stockdale,
people at the good-to-great companies in our research confronted
the most brutal facts of their current realityyet simultaneously
maintained absolute faith that they would prevail in the end.
And they held both disciplinesfaith and factsat the same
time, all the time.
Buildup-Breakthrough Flywheel: Good-to-great transformations
do not happen overnight or in one big leap. Rather, the process
resembles relentlessly pushing a giant, heavy flywheel in one
direction. At first, pushing it gets the flywheel to turn once.
With consistent effort, it goes two turns, then five, then ten,
building increasing momentum untilbang!the wheel hits the
breakthrough point, and the momentum kicks in its favor. Our comparison
companies never sustained the kind of breakthrough momentum that
our good-to-great companies did; instead, they lurched back and
forth with radical change programs, reactionary moves, and restructurings.
The Hedgehog Concept: In a famous essay, philosopher
and scholar Isaiah Berlin described two approaches to thought
and life, using a simple parable: The fox knows a little about
many things, but the hedgehog knows only one big thing very well.
The fox is complex; the hedgehog simple. And the hedgehog wins.
Our research shows that breakthroughs require a simple, hedgehog-like
understanding of three intersecting circles: what a company can
be the best in the world at, how its economics work best, and
what best ignites the passions of its people. Breakthroughs happen
when you get the hedgehog concept and become systematic and consistent
with it, eliminating virtually anything that does not fit in the
three circles.
Technology Accelerators: The good-to-great companies had
a paradoxical relationship to technology. On the one hand, they
assiduously avoided jumping on new technology bandwagons. On the
other hand, they were pioneers in the application of carefully
selected technologies, making bold, farsighted investments
in those that directly link to their hedgehog concept. Like turbochargers,
these technology accelerators create an explosion in flywheel
momentum.
A Culture of Discipline: When you look across the good-to-great
transformations, they consistently display three forms of discipline:
disciplined people, disciplined thought, and disciplined action.
When you have disciplined people, you don’t need hierarchy. When
you have disciplined thought, you don’t need bureaucracy. When
you have disciplined action, you don’t need excessive controls.
When you combine a culture of discipline with an ethic of entrepreneurship,
you get the magical alchemy of great performance.
|